Phonics vs, the Look Say Method

Over the past decades, the slide down in the rate of literacy in America has baffled numerous. At least 20% of spirited take aim graduates atomic number 18 function eachy illiterate, despite the didactics they receive in the unrestricted coach system. As these graduates enter the world learning at an undecomposable level, they are unable to come through a normal life, which leads to poverty and toilet lead to delinquency and imprisonment. This decline is non besides a decline of literacy, but also a decline of independence, ingenuity, and responsibility.The beginning of this decline place be traced back to a certain heretoforet in the chronicle of the public school system the introduction of the reckon for theorize regularity in the 1930s. Ever since the opinion say manner, or Whole playscript instruction, took the place of phonics, the number of illiterate graduates has grown steeper and higher. Evidence proves that the weigh say mode is not sufficient to properly t each(prenominal) learners how to read. Phonics is farthest superior to the grimace say manner of encyclopedism to read. First of all, phonics is bump than the tone of voice say system of learning to read because phonics has a firmer al-Qaeda than the reflexion say method.Phonics is based on controls that the youngster gyps therefore, when he has memorized these rules, he can read almost any(prenominal) phrase he sees. A small article by the Abeka exercise programs shows many rules that are taught in phonics, such as the following When there is angiotensin-converting enzyme vowel in a word, that vowel usually says its short sound and when there are two vowels in a word, the first vowel says its long sound, and molybdenum vowel is silent (Six Easy Steps to Reading, 1). When the nestling learns decisive rules such as these, he is more likely to apply them because he knows that they will not change.Sebastian Wren writes in his article Developing Research- based Resources for the fit Reading Teacher, he tells that children are explicitly taught the rules ab forth the way lyric poem are written and spelled, and they are taught spelling-sound relationships. After the trainer provides an explicit less(prenominal)on in a particular Phonics rule, the child is presented with a passage text that contains many haggling consistent with that rule. This provides the child with an opportunity to apply each Phonics rule on a variety of spoken language in context of the passage.The purpose of the Phonics teacher, then, is to instill the children with the Phonics rules and the common spelling-sound relationships, and to teach children to apply this knowledge in sounding-out each word they encounter, making that assumption that comprehension and appreciation will be a natural consequence of accuracy (Wren, 1). Basically, when the child is taught these rules and then granted the opportunity try the rules, he will find that these rules can mili tary service him to read with ease. In contrast, the look say method has no definite rules that he can put into practice as he reads.Phonics is go than the look say method because it has a definite set of rules that the child can apply when he reads. The look say method requires ofttimes guessing if the child does not know the word that he is stressful to read. Because he has not been taught definite rules like those of the phonics method, he is unsure of how to procure the task of reading. In her al-Quran The Good School, peg Tyre tells kinda of children being involveed to learn individual earn by rote learning memory, then syllables, and finally words, they were saluten books with pictures of common objects.Underneath each picture was its simple name. Kids were taught to derive meaning from words by memorizing the look of the words, or looking for at the picture and guessing, or reviewing the context and extrapolating, instead of sounding them out (96). Rather than bei ng taught how to read using rules and hints, the children are taught to read by guessing what the word is based on the context. Samuel L. Blumenfeld explains in his book The tonic Illiterates some of what the students are taught He is taught the names of seventeen consonant letters and their sound values only as appear at the beginnings of words.What phonetic value they have in the middle of words is neither considered nor discussed. The letter is taught merely as a phonetic jot to the wordone clue among several taught as word-attack skills. In fact, the child is not encourage to use a phonetic clue until he has first spent context and word-form clues. If these fail him, then he is to try the phonetic clue of the initial-consonant sound (74). Phonetic rules are not demonstrated clearly, and looking at the context to determine the word and its meaning is encouraged. However, simply guessing what the word is only makes the child unsure of himself.Phonics and its rules are far bett er to teach than the look say method and its guessing. Secondly, phonics is better than the look say method because it is far easier for the child to comprehend, conquer, and enjoy. In an article entitle Whole words vs. Phonics, Sebastien Wren, Ph. D. says that the look say method is nothing more than the rote committal to memory of every word in the English language (Whole nomenclature vs. Phonics, 1). The look say method basically requires the student to basically memorize every single English word in existence, an extremely challenging feat for a young person.The article Whole banter Versus Phonics tells that only the smartest Chinese can memorize 20,000 of their ideograms, but Whole Word promoters expect you to memorize 50,000 to 10,000 English words. In short, Whole Word expects ordinary battalion to accomplish a feat thats only possible with a photographic memory (Whole Word Versus Phonics, 1). A young student can hardly expect to conquer reading this way. Memorizing that many words is absolutely ludicrous when one could read them if they knew the simple rules of phonics. Phonics is especially mandatory with someone who may be slow at learning.Blumenfeld writes it in his book NEA fifth column Horse in American Education Slow learners in particular found look-say overwhelmingly difficult. That would explain why before look-say was adopt slow learners learned to read without great difficulty via the alphabetic phonics method (118). The phonics method is far easier than the look say method to understand for any person. Progress with the phonics method is far more rapid than that of the look say method. The article Whole Word Versus Phonics says Phonics, it is claimed, can teach almost all children to read by the end of first grade.The reading may be slow and halting at first, but in a a few(prenominal) years the child is able to read ordinary books for amusement or facts of life (Whole Word Versus Phonics, 1). This is vastly more rapid than the loo k say method. The article continues In fact, few students can memorize even 300 words per year. This difficulty is confirmed all over the profit by lists of sight words that have third grade students learning simple one-syllable words such as bring, clean, cut, done, draw, drink, eight, fall, far, full, got, grow, hold, hot, hurt, if, and keep (Whole Word Versus Phonics, 1).Students learning phonics would have conquered these words in the first grade, if not sooner. The get up of the look say method is significantly slower than that of the phonics method. Phonics is more socialise for the child, whereas the look say method becomes dull and savorless. Learning phonics is more provoke for the child because they are able to use the rules themselves and apply it to the words themselves. However, the look say method is very repetitious. Blumenfeld writes the following about his research in his book The New Illiterates Oh is repeated 138 times and see 176.Repetitions of these two word s alone must equal the entire wordage of the first Pre-Primer. What a slow, dull, monotonous way to learn two words (43). The look say method is dull and monotonous to the point of being just unnecessary. The children who are taught this method become extremely averse to reading because the way that they were taught is so tedious and uninteresting. Phonics is better than the look say method because it easier for the child to comprehend, conquer, and enjoy.Finally, the phonics method produces a larger number of competent, literate students than that of the look say method. Phonics gives the students a superstar of definite understanding and accomplishment that can encourage them to make something of themselves. Because they recover confident, they will want to show the world what they can do. However, the reading students that the look say method produces do not feel as confident. The mortification that this child will feel because he cannot read is acute.In his book NEA Trojan H orse in American Education, Samuel L. Blumenfeld cites an article by Dr. Samuel T. Orton Faulty article of faith methods may not only prevent the acquisition of academic education by children of average capacity but may also give rise to far reaching damage to their emotional life (111). The look say method could not only cause the child to be a poor reader but also harm the childs confidence. However, the phonics method gives the child a desire to use this energy to make a name for himself.Students who cannot read well are less likely to be productive in productive in their living. In her book The Good School How Smart Parents Get Their Kids the Education They Deserve, Peg Tyre tells of some research on the outcome of learning the look say method Seventy-four percent of struggling third-grade readers still get by in ninth grade, which in turn makes it hard to graduate from high school. Those who do manage to press onand who manage to graduate from high schooloften find that thei r dreams of succeeding in higher education are frustratingly elusive.It wont surprise you to know that kids who struggle in reading grow up to be adults who struggle to hold on to steady workthey are more likely to experience periods of elongate unemployment, require welfare services, and are more likely to end up in jail (94). Learning the look say method has wrought horrible effects on the lives of many students in terms of their future. Because these students were taught how to read using the look say method and therefore do not read well, they are most likely not going to live productively. Phonics is far better than the look say method of learning to read.Evidence proves that the look say method is not teaching students how to read properly. The public school claims that they teach children how to read exceptionally well however, if that is the case, these students who graduate should be reading at high levels. But as more and more functionally illiterate students graduate, t hey find it extremely difficult to live the lives they had always conceive of for themselves because they cannot read well. This inability to read leads to many of the problems that are in confederation today, such as unemployment, negligence, and dependence on the government.